Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42036948›Full record

ArticlePalliative medicine2026

The use of telemedicine in palliative care in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review.

William Goodman, Mandeep Bhattarai, Hasan Shahzad, Sijia Chen, Shaunna Burke, Matthew Allsop

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

William GoodmanSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8936-0787
Mandeep BhattaraiKirkburton Health Centre, Huddersfield, UK.
Hasan ShahzadSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.
Sijia ChenSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.
Shaunna BurkeSchool of Biomedical Sciences, University of Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8097-2026
Matthew AllsopSchool of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7399-0194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTelemedicine may improve access and delivery of palliative care in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite increasing adoption and diverse applications, there is limited understanding of their use in palliative care.

aimDetermine the challenges, enablers and key characteristics of telemedicine interventions targeting outcomes delivered in palliative care in LMICs.

designA scoping review guided by the JBI methodology. DATA SOURCES: Six databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Global Health, CINAHL and IEEE Xplore) were searched for reports published between 2003 and August 2025. WHO IRIS and clinical trial registries were searched in March 2026. Forward and backward citation searching was also conducted.

resultsOf the 7938 reports identified from database searches, 21 met the inclusion criteria. Additional searches of WHO IRIS and clinical trial registries did not identify any additional reports. Most interventions focused on telemonitoring (

conclusionsTelemedicine demonstrates emerging, context-specific potential to support access to palliative care in LMICs, although the current evidence base is limited and concentrated in middle-income and cancer-focused settings. Future research should adopt theoretically informed, system-integrated approaches with consistent evaluation to ensure equitable and sustainable delivery.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesPalliative CareTelemedicineHumansdeveloping countriespalliative carescoping reviewtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42036948
PMCPMC13323915

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.