Evidence mapPaperPMID 42038096Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of public health2026

Exercise Interventions and Pregnancy-Related Back Pain: Evidence and Gaps From a Systematic Review.

Jinchen Chen, Hongli Yu, Dagmara Damps, Anna Szumilewicz

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jinchen ChenFaculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Hongli YuFaculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Dagmara DampsFaculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.
Anna SzumilewiczFaculty of Physical Culture, Gdansk University of Physical Education and Sport, Gdansk, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To review and synthesize existing evidence on exercise interventions of varying intensity for pregnancy-related back pain and to identify directions for future research. Methods: A systematic review of nine studies involving 1,438 participants was conducted. Interventions focused predominantly on low-to moderate-intensity exercise, and no study employed high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Exercise types included aerobic and resistance training as well as aquatic and stability exercises. Results: Most studies demonstrated significant reductions in back pain, but methodological heterogeneity and limited sample sizes prevented meta-analytical synthesis. Randomized controlled trials showed moderate risk of bias due to challenges in blinding and randomization, while non-randomized trials had substantial limitations, including inadequate measurement validation and increased risk of bias. Conclusion: Existing evidence supports the potential benefits of low-to moderate-intensity exercise for pregnancy-related back pain but remains methodologically weak. High-quality studies are needed to evaluate HIIT and other innovative strategies for managing pain and improving maternal health and wellbeing. Trial Registration: identifier CRD42024578089.

Indexed as

Back PainExercise TherapyPregnancy ComplicationsEvidence GapsFemaleHumansPregnancyback painexercisehigh-intensity interval trainingpregnancysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42038096
PMCPMC13102635

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.