ArticleDepression and anxiety2026
Rumination Out Loud? Linguistic, Neural, and Psychophysiological Correlates of the Think-Aloud Paradigm.
Article in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rumination Out Loud? Linguistic, Neural, and Psychophysiological Correlates of the Think-Aloud Paradigm.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress and rumination are closely linked and contribute to the development and maintenance of mental disorders, yet assessing rumination in an ecologically valid way remains challenging. Conducting the think aloud paradigm (TAP) following the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) allows for the real-time evaluation of ruminative responses, providing insights beyond traditional self-report measures. This study aimed to investigate ruminative responses to the TSST using the TAP, while simultaneously assessing psychological (stress, affect, state rumination), physiological (heart rate), and neural data with functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). For this, a total of 58 healthy participants (mean age 23.47 years (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.