SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2026
Real-world use of emapalumab in hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis: a scoping review of published evidence.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision immunomodulation for pediatric hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis in intensive care.Pediatric investigation · 2026Review
- Article
- Long-Term Treatment With Emapalumab in an Adult Patient With Refractory Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report.Case reports in hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Emapalumab, an interferon-γ (interferon-gamma)-blocking monoclonal antibody, has emerged as a targeted therapy for refractory hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). This scoping review summarizes real-world evidence of its clinical use across HLH subtypes. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science through September 2025 identified studies reporting emapalumab use outside clinical trials. Case reports, series, and observational studies describing clinical outcomes were included. Results: Thirty-one publications comprising 86 patients were analyzed. Disease contexts included familial/genetic HLH (n = 11), rheumatology-associated macrophage activation syndrome (MAS; n = 12), malignancy-associated HLH (n = 25), infection-associated HLH (n = 22), CAR-T/IEC-HS or cytokine-release-syndrome-related HLH (chimeric antigen receptor T-cell/immune effector cell-associated hemophagocytic syndrome; n = 11), and other secondary HLH (n = 5). Across all categories, emapalumab achieved rapid suppression of hyperinflammation, typically within 1-2 weeks. Clinical response rates were 100% in familial HLH, 91.7% in rheumatology-associated MAS, 72.7% in infection-associated HLH, 90.9% in CAR-T/IEC-HS-related HLH, and 80% in other secondary HLH. In contrast, only 6 of 25 patients with malignancy-associated HLH (24%) showed partial or complete responses, reflecting inferior outcomes due to underlying disease progression. Overall survival was highest in familial and infection-associated subgroups. The reported adverse events were generally infrequent and mild in the published cases, but causality cannot be reliably established given the complexity of the underlying disease and concurrent therapies. Conclusion: Real-world evidence demonstrates that emapalumab induces rapid and durable disease control across diverse HLH subtypes, with a favorable tolerability profile. However, outcomes remain markedly inferior in malignancy-associated HLH, where response rates are limited to approximately 24%, primarily due to the impact of underlying malignancy. Its role as rescue or bridging therapy to hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT) is increasingly supported in both pediatric and adult populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.