ReviewGalen medical journal2025
Narrative Review of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Disease Detection : Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmic Diseases Detection.
Review in Galen medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pachychoroid diseases of the macula: an update.Medical hypothesis, discovery & innovation ophthalmology journal · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing ophthalmology and optometry by utilizing high-resolution imaging modalities such as optical coherence tomography (OCT), fundus photography, and corneal topography. These modalities generate quantifiable data suitable for machine learning (ML), facilitating automated diagnosis of ocular conditions like diabetic retinopathy, glaucoma, and age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which are leading causes of visual impairment worldwide. This narrative review evaluates the role of ML in improving diagnostic accuracy and accessibility in eye care, focusing on methodological complexities, supervised and unsupervised learning approaches, and challenges in clinical integration. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive narrative literature review was conducted, analyzing ML applications in ophthalmology. Results: AI systems exhibit high sensitivity and specificity, often outperforming human graders in diabetic retinopathy screening and early detection of glaucoma and AMD using OCT and fundus imaging. Anterior segment diseases benefit from AI-driven corneal topography analysis. Challenges include image quality, dataset imbalances, and variability in imaging protocols, necessitating fine-tuning for diverse clinical environments. Unsupervised learning shows potential for identifying novel biomarkers but requires further validation. Conclusion: AI-driven ML models significantly enhance eye disease diagnostics, improving accuracy and accessibility, particularly in resource-limited settings. However, challenges like data standardization and model generalizability must be addressed to ensure robust clinical adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.