ArticleNetwork neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2026
Metastability of resting-state bold fMRI as a reliable biomarker of individual brain dynamics: An interrogation of within-subject variability as a function of total acquisition time.
Article in Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metastability of BOLD fMRI signals is a commonly used proxy of brain dynamics in behavioral and clinical studies. To date, little has been done to assess the confidence with which we can use estimates of metastability as reliable biomarkers of individual brain state. We analyze whole-brain and network-specific metastability for a highly sampled individual brain (84 sessions taken over 18 months) and quantify the within-subject reliability for the metrics as a function of the amount of data used, which we find to be comparable to that seen for static functional connectivity. As considerable variability is observed across networks in the required amount of data, we combine the networks' metrics in one novel feature vector that exhibits an order of magnitude improvement in reliability. We then test reproducibility by analyzing the Midnight Scan Club dataset (10 subjects imaged over 10 consecutive days). Finally, we examine the susceptibility to change of the proposed metastability measure in another dataset examining brain dynamics under the effect of psilocybin. We conclude that the networks' metastability feature vector exhibits strong within-subject reliability that renders it a promising candidate for the study of individual-specific biomarkers of brain dynamics and potential targets for precision neuromodulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.