ArticleACS omega2026
Mitragynine and Morphine Stabilize Different Conformations of the μ‑Opioid Receptor as Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulation Studies.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated quantitative proteomics reveals stress-associated network remodeling induced by mitragynine in RSC96 Schwann cells.Archives of toxicology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
(-)-Mitragynine, a natural alkaloid, is known for its analgesic effects and functions as a G protein-biased ligand of the μ-opioid receptor (μOR). This study examined the structural alterations in the μOR upon binding with (-)-mitragynine, (+)-mitragynine, 7-OH-mitragynine, and morphine using molecular docking and 1 μs classical all-atom molecular dynamics simulations. The μOR showed relatively stable RMSD ranging from 1.6 to 3.2 Å for mitragynine derivatives and morphine during dynamics, though residues 260-280 exhibited notable fluctuations. (-)-Mitragynine formed an average of one hydrogen bond more consistently than the other ligands throughout the simulation period. MM/PBSA calculations suggested that Asp-147 (3.32), Tyr-148 (3.33), Met-151 (3.36), and Trp-293 (6.84) contributed to ligand binding. Asp-147 (3.32) plays a critical role in the formation of a salt bridge and contributes the most to binding all mitragynine derivatives and morphine. All four ligands preferentially interacted with Trp-293 (6.84) in helix-6, highlighting its role in receptor activation and postsignaling activities. A plot of the binding free energy versus the helix-6 tilt angle and the distance between Asp-147 (3.32) and the tertiary nitrogen of the ligand revealed a distinct conformational population at 6 to 10 Å and 90 to 140° tilting of the receptor for morphine compared to mitragynine, which may explain helix-6's role and salt bridge distance in μOR activation and downstream signaling biases. Our study provides a structural foundation for designing novel μOR ligands as potential new analgesics.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.