ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Optimizing the timing of painless gastroscope insertion: integrating advanced monitoring tools to enhance safety and efficacy: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Safety and Efficacy of Oliceridine Combined with Propofol for Painless Gastroscopy: A Single-Center, Randomized, Parallel Controlled Clinical Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Painless gastroscopy demonstrates significant improvement in patient comfort and examination compliance, which might indicate that the procedure has become commonly used in clinical practice. However, the critical step of accurately determining insertion timing could present challenges, given that unified standards and objective criteria appear to be lacking. Moreover, improper timing of insertion may increase patient discomfort and the risk of procedural complications while potentially affecting diagnostic accuracy. Traditionally, the eyelash reflex, respiratory patterns, blood pressure, heart rate, and other vital sign changes have been observed by clinicians to assist in judging optimal insertion time. Nevertheless, these indicators show limitations in sensitivity and specificity. Given that rapid advances in anesthesia monitoring technologies have occurred, advanced tools such as the Bispectral Index (BIS), capnography, perfusion index (PI), and ultrasound measurement of vocal cord angles could demonstrate gradual application in assessing insertion timing for painless gastroscopy. Thus, relevant literature may be systematically reviewed in this article. Furthermore, the theoretical foundations and clinical applications of these monitoring indicators might be deeply analyzed. Therefore, the findings could provide clinicians with scientific, objective, and effective methods for evaluating insertion timing, which may enhance safety and efficacy of painless gastroscopy procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.