ReviewJournal of neuromuscular diseases2026
Optoacoustic muscle imaging.
Review in Journal of neuromuscular diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOptoacoustic imaging (OAI) has emerged as a powerful modality for visualizing biological tissues with high spatial resolution and molecular specificity. When applied to skeletal muscle tissue, OAI provides unique opportunities to investigate muscle composition, function, and physiology beyond the capabilities of conventional imaging methods.
resultsLiterature search was conducted in PubMed using ("Optoacoustic" OR "Photoacoustic") AND ("Muscle"), with relevant references additionally screened. Clinical studies include over 440 patients, mostly on skeletal muscle in neuromuscular disorders and peripheral artery disease. OAI detected structural changes such as fibrosis, and fatty infiltration, as well as functional impairments related to muscle perfusion and oxygenation. Preclinical studies demonstrate volumetric imaging of cardiac muscle, reflecting ongoing technological advances. DISCUSSION: This review summarizes the fundamental principles of optoacoustic muscle imaging, technical implementations, and translational applications. Furthermore, it discusses approaches to signal quantification, artifacts, as well as translation into clinical practice. Emphasis is placed on applications in the field of neuromuscular disease, where OAI holds promise as a non-invasive, radiation-free, and bedside imaging modality for characterizing and monitoring disease-specific muscle alterations.
conclusionOAI represents a rapidly evolving field with significant potential for advancing both fundamental muscle physiology research and the diagnosis and monitoring of (neuro-)muscular disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.