Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42041554›Full record

ReviewCells2026

Machine Learning in Single-Molecule Tracking Analysis of Superresolution Optical Microscopy Data.

Lucas A Saavedra, Francisco J Barrantes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lucas A SaavedraDivision of Molecular Neurobiology, Biomedical Research Institute UCA-CONICET, Buenos Aires C1107AAZ, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-3566-1154
Francisco J BarrantesDivision of Molecular Neurobiology, Biomedical Research Institute UCA-CONICET, Buenos Aires C1107AAZ, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-4745-681X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is transforming the analysis of biomolecular data, holding significant promise for improving the efficiency and accuracy of microscopy image analysis and for studying the dynamics of molecules in live cells. As data-driven approaches continue to evolve, they may eventually replace traditional statistical methods that rely on conventional analytical methods. This review examines and critically analyses the state of the art of ML techniques as applied to various levels of data supervision in the analysis of dynamic single-molecule datasets obtained using superresolution optical microscopy. Collectively encompassed under the umbrella of "nanoscopy", these methods currently comprise targeted techniques such as stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy and stochastic techniques like single-molecule localization microscopies (SMLMs), comprising photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM), DNA points accumulation for imaging in nanoscale topography (DNA-PAINT) microscopy, and minimal fluorescence photon flux (MINFLUX) microscopy. These techniques all enable the imaging of subcellular components and molecules beyond the diffraction limit, and some are additionally capable of studying their dynamics in real time, as reviewed here, using several ML techniques that facilitate motion analysis in two or three dimensions with qualitative and quantitative characterisation in the live cell. It is expected that the growing use of learning-based approaches in biological microscopy data processing will dramatically increase throughput and accelerate progress in this rapidly developing field.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMicroscopySingle Molecule ImagingAnimalsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, Fluorescenceartificial intelligencedeep learningdiffusionfeature engineeringmachine learningsingle-molecule trackingstochastic processes

Identifiers

PMID42041554
PMCPMC13114860

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.