ReviewBrain sciences2026
Driving with Motor Neuron Disease: Disease-Specific Considerations, Multi-Domain Assessments and Support Strategies.
Review in Brain sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motor neuron diseases (MNDs) encompass a clinically heterogeneous group of neurodegenerative conditions with varying impact on dexterity, mobility, decision making, respiratory and bulbar dysfunction. While consensus best-practice recommendations exist for genetic screening, diagnostic work-up, pharmacological and respiratory management, disease-specific facets of driving safety, assessment approaches and intervention strategies to support patients for safe driving have not been comprehensively reviewed. MNDs have unique, phenotype-specific clinical features, which are distinct form other neuromuscular conditions which necessitate a careful and systematic approach to evaluate driving safety. While MNDs are primarily associated with progressive motor impairment, extrapyramidal, cerebellar, cognitive, behavioural, and respiratory manifestations of the disease also affect driving safety and necessitate comprehensive driving assessments and individualised strategies to enable patients to continue to drive. The majority of existing papers focus on amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and low-incidence MND phenotypes, such as PLS, SBMA, PPS, are glaringly understudied from a driving safety perspective despite the relatively slower progression of these conditions. Beyond the review of specific aspects of driving in MNDs, the main objective of this review paper is to raise awareness of non-motor aspects of MNDs with regard to driving safety and to explore viable strategies to support patients to maintain their independence. Despite the considerable differences in driving regulations around the globe, there are core, disease-specific aspects of MND which are universal. The careful consideration of these clinical factors, comprehensive domain-by-domain assessments, and the implementation of practical, individualised adaptations may enable patients to continue driving safely, maintain their independence and enhance their quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.