Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042557›Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026

A Conceptual Framework for Understanding Patient Expectations in Individualised Anaesthesia and Analgesia: A Narrative Review and Future Directions.

Krister Mogianos, Anna K M Persson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Krister MogianosDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Halland Hospital, 301 85 Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0009-0622-990X
Anna K M PerssonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Halland Hospital, 301 85 Halmstad, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9000-849X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute postoperative pain remains a major clinical challenge, affecting both recovery and resource utilisation. Beyond nociceptive input, pain is shaped by cognitive and emotional factors, including patient expectations. This narrative review examines the role of expectations in perioperative pain modulation, framed within predictive coding and Bayesian inference models. These models conceptualise pain as a probabilistic process that integrates sensory input with prior expectations, weighted by precision. In theory, positive expectations may enhance analgesic efficacy, whereas negative expectations may amplify pain via nocebo mechanisms. Control modifies expectations and may reduce perceived pain, while uncertainty diminishes these benefits. Evidence from observational studies links preoperative pain self-efficacy and anticipated pain scores to postoperative outcomes, yet interventional trials remain scarce. In this narrative review, we propose that expectation-sensitive strategies, including structured communication and computational modelling, may inform individualised anaesthesia and analgesia. Future research should validate these frameworks in clinical trials, optimise preoperative expectation management, and explore synergistic approaches that combine pharmacology with cognitive modulation. Understanding and leveraging expectations may offer a promising conceptual direction for more individualised perioperative care, although this approach remains hypothesis-generating at present.

Indexed as

Bayesian modellingindividualised anaesthesiapostoperative painpredictive codingprior expectations

Identifiers

PMID42042557
PMCPMC13117224

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.