ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026
Machine Perfusion Across Marginal Liver Grafts: Benefits and Challenges.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liver transplantation is the definitive therapy for end-stage liver disease, yet persistent organ shortages result in approximately 10% of recovered livers being discarded, with markedly higher discard rates among marginal grafts from elderly donors, donation after circulatory death (DCD), and those with macrovesicular steatosis. Machine perfusion (MP) has emerged as a paradigm-shifting preservation strategy with the potential to safely expand the usable donor pool. This narrative review examines the current evidence for three MP modalities-hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP), normothermic machine perfusion (NMP), and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP)-across various marginal donor populations, including elderly donors, steatotic grafts, donors with infectious diseases, and split liver transplantation. Current evidence demonstrates that MP significantly increases utilization of steatotic grafts with up to an eightfold rise in usage of severely steatotic organs. HMP consistently reduces non-anastomotic biliary strictures and early allograft dysfunction across donor types, while NMP enables real-time viability assessment and reduces post-reperfusion syndrome in steatotic grafts. NRP shows particular benefit in DCD organs, reducing biliary complications and improving one-year survival. Additionally, MP extends preservation times enabling next-day split liver transplantation and shows promise as a platform for ex situ antiviral therapy. Despite compelling evidence supporting MP in marginal grafts, widespread adoption remains constrained by high costs, logistical complexity, and the absence of standardized protocols. Future progress will require multicenter studies evaluating long-term outcomes alongside consensus-driven implementation frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.