Evidence mapPaperPMID 42042596Full record

ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2026

Personalized Diabetes Therapy Part 2-Individual Diabetes Treatment (Standard of Care Plus, SOC+).

Julia Jantz, Andreas Pfützner

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Julia JantzPfützner Science & Health Institute, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-7103-6973
Andreas PfütznerPfützner Science & Health Institute, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2385-0887

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional diabetes therapy primarily targets HbA1c using a standardized, stepwise approach, often neglecting individual clinical and diagnostic phenotypes. In this second part of our discussion, we present an alternative strategy. After phenotyping the patient, we initiate a targeted pharmacological combination therapy tailored to the individual's underlying pathophysiology, alongside lifestyle modifications. Sulfonylureas are completely avoided in this approach. Instead, medications are selected based on their alignment with the patient's phenotype and absence of contraindications. Early insulin therapy, for example, is particularly effective in patients with β-cell-dysfunction-driven diabetes, whereas GLP-1-supported weight reduction and glitazone therapy are more suitable for insulin-resistance-driven diabetes. For monitoring and determining when temporary therapy intensification may be necessary, we rely on a combination of functional biomarkers (intact proinsulin, adiponectin, hsCRP, and leptin) and conventional clinical parameters (HbA1c, BMI, lipids, blood pressure). Using this personalized strategy, we have consistently achieved long-term glycemic control-often maintaining normal HbA1c levels for up to 15 years in our patients so far.

Indexed as

functional biomarkerpersonalized diabetes treatmentphenotypingtype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID42042596
PMCPMC13117158

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.