ArticleVaccines2026
Efficacy and Limitations of an Improved Vaccine Derived from an Updated Vaccine Strain Against H5 High Pathogenicity Avian Influenza.
Article in Vaccines, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesBiosecurity and stamping out are key control measures against H5 high pathogenicity avian influenza (HPAI) outbreaks. Vaccination in poultry is an additional tool to reduce disease risk and facilitate timely containment. This study aimed to establish a candidate vaccine strain against H5 HPAI in Asia and validate its protective efficacy.
methodsBased on genetic and antigenic analyses, a representative HPAI virus, A/duck/Vietnam/HU16-DD3/2023 (H5N1), collected in northern Vietnam, was selected to generate a candidate vaccine strain, rgPR8/VN23HA∆KRRK-NA (rgPR8/VN23; H5N1), using reverse genetics, followed by formulation of an inactivated oil-adjuvanted vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was evaluated by measuring humoral antibody responses after intramuscular vaccination and by assessing mortality and virus recovery following intranasal challenge with a clade 2.3.4.4b virus, A/Ezo red fox/Hokkaido/1/2022 (H5N1). Results were compared with those obtained using an antigenically homologous vaccine to the challenge strain and a Japanese stockpiled vaccine.
resultsAll vaccinated juvenile chickens developed sufficient immunity to survive the challenge at 21 days post-vaccination. The rgPR8/VN23 (H5N1) and homologous vaccines markedly reduced virus recovery, suggesting near-sterile protection, whereas low-titer viruses were transiently detected in chickens vaccinated with the stockpiled vaccine. The rgPR8/VN23 (H5N1) vaccine conferred clinical protection in juvenile chickens as early as 8 days post-vaccination. A single dose of the rgPR8/VN23 (H5N1) vaccine provided incomplete protection in laying hens, whereas a double-volume regimen improved protective efficacy.
conclusionsThe rgPR8/VN23 (H5N1) vaccine conferred strong immunity to juvenile chickens; however, a refined vaccination strategy may be required to achieve complete protection in laying hens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.