Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42042844›Full record

ReviewPharmacy (Basel, Switzerland)2026

Access to Medicines in Bulgaria and North Macedonia: Legislative, Pricing, and Reimbursement Perspectives.

Anna Todorova, Dijana Miceva, Mariya Ivanova, Tanya Kazakova, Bistra Angelovska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna TodorovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-9273-3487
Dijana MicevaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, Krste Misirkov Str., No. 10-A, P.O. Box 201, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia.ORCID 0009-0009-5474-7461
Mariya IvanovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-6766-056X
Tanya KazakovaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University Varna, 9000 Varna, Bulgaria.ORCID 0009-0008-6958-3810
Bistra AngelovskaFaculty of Medical Sciences, Goce Delcev University, Krste Misirkov Str., No. 10-A, P.O. Box 201, 2000 Stip, North Macedonia.

Funding

Fund "Nauka" at Medical University of Varna 22018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National legislative frameworks governing prescribing, pricing, reimbursement, and dispensing play a decisive role in shaping access to medicines. This study examines the financial availability of medicines in Bulgaria and North Macedonia through a comparative review of national pharmaceutical legislation, pricing mechanisms, reimbursement models, and digitalisation policies, assessed in relation to European Union standards. The findings indicate that access to medicines in both countries is shaped by the combined effects of multiple regulatory and financial instruments rather than by individual policy measures. Both systems apply strict control of prescribing and dispensing, external reference pricing, and positive reimbursement lists, reflecting alignment with international recommendations. However, significant differences in policy design lead to divergent access outcomes. Bulgaria's more advanced digitalisation of prescribing and reimbursement, including mandatory electronic prescribing for selected therapeutic groups, enhances regulatory oversight and expenditure control but is associated with higher patient out-of-pocket expenditure, partly due to the application of the standard value-added tax on medicines. In contrast, North Macedonia combines lower taxation with capped patient co-payments, higher regulated pharmacy margins, and fixed pharmacy remuneration per prescription, contributing to improved financial affordability for patients while supporting pharmacy sustainability. Additional instruments, such as the Generics without Co-Payment List, further strengthen patient financial protection. The study provides comparative evidence relevant to pharmaceutical policy reforms and highlights the importance of balanced regulatory approaches that promote affordability, system sustainability, and equitable access to medicines.

Indexed as

Bulgariacommunity pharmaciesEUNorth Macedoniapharmaceutical legislationpharmacistsprescribingpricingreimbursement

Identifiers

PMID42042844
PMCPMC13119055

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.