Evidence mapPaperPMID 42043739Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026

Long-term prognostic value of staging surgery for high-intermediate-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer.

Alise de Jong, Jasper Markus, Ronald P Zweemer, Jacob P Hoogendam, Judith M Roesink, Inge O Baas, Geertruida N Jonges, Cornelis G Gerestein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Alise de JongDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-6314-3031
Jasper MarkusDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7429-1766
Ronald P ZweemerDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1829-7773
Jacob P HoogendamDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Judith M RoesinkDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6586-0405
Inge O BaasDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4712-9963
Geertruida N JongesDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Cornelis G GeresteinDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, PO Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. c.g.gerestein-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0490-2258

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prognostic relevance of surgical staging in patients with high-intermediate-risk and high-risk endometrial cancer remains uncertain. In this cohort study, we investigated the prognostic role of robot-assisted laparoscopic staging surgery among patients with clinically early-stage endometrial carcinoma at a high-intermediate-risk or high-risk for recurrence. Clinical data of women with clinically International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage I–II, grade 3 endometrioid or non-endometrioid EC who were intended to undergo robot-assisted laparoscopic staging surgery were retrospectively collected from a single tertiary referral center. The procedure consisted of total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic lymphadenectomy, and, when feasible, para-aortic lymphadenectomy, with additional omentectomy and peritoneal biopsies performed in a subset of cases. Survival outcomes were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis, with additional subgroup analyses by histological subtype. A total of 166 patients, of which 154 patients (92.8%) with FIGO 2009 stage I and 12 patients (7.2%) with FIGO 2009 stage II were included, comprising various histological subtypes, including 64 (38.6%) with endometrioid carcinoma, 52 (31.3%) with serous carcinoma, 11 (6.6%) with clear cell carcinoma, and 27 (16.3%) with carcinosarcoma. Thirty-two patients (19.3%) were reclassified as having FIGO stage disease III–IV based on final pathology. The 5-year disease-specific survival was 25.5% for upstaged patients compared with 73.1% for those who were not upstaged. Robot-assisted laparoscopic staging provides valuable prognostic information in clinically early-stage endometrial cancer with a high-intermediate-risk or high-risk of recurrence. These findings underscore the value of surgical staging in informing prognosis and guiding adjuvant treatment decisions.

Indexed as

Endometrial NeoplasmsLaparoscopyRobotic Surgical ProceduresAgedFemaleHumansHysterectomyLymph Node ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSalpingo-oophorectomyDisease-free survivalEndometrial neoplasmsRecurrenceRobotic surgical proceduresTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID42043739
PMCPMC13121418

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.