Evidence mapPaperPMID 42043921Full record

ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2026

Assessment of IPAY 2027 Medicare drug price negotiation maximum fair prices with prices in most-favored nation reference countries.

Nico Gabriel, Kristi Martin, Emma M Cousin, Kevin H Li, Jens Grueger, Sean D Sullivan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nico GabrielSkaggs School of Pharmacy, University of California San Diego.
Kristi MartinCamber Collective, Washington, DC.
Emma M CousinThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.
Kevin H LiThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.
Jens GruegerThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.
Sean D SullivanThe CHOICE Institute, School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrescription drug list prices in the United States far exceed those in peer nations, averaging 278% of non-US prices and 422% for branded products. The Inflation Reduction Act authorized Medicare to negotiate net prices for high-expenditure drugs, resulting in maximum fair prices (MFPs) for 15 Part D products effective in 2027. Subsequently, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) introduced the GLOBE and GUARD models, which propose a most-favored nation (MFN) pricing framework for both Part B and Part D, respectively, that is tied to international prices in 19 countries. CMS also introduced the GENEROUS model for Medicaid, which uses an 8-country subset of the GLOBE/GUARD reference nations.

objectiveTo evaluate the performance of the Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program by comparing negotiated net prices with domestic and international list price benchmarks.

methodsWe identified negotiated drugs using CMS publications and estimated initial US net prices and CMS price benchmarks for negotiation including statutory discounts. International list prices from the 19 countries that will be used as reference for the GUARD and GLOBE models were extracted from Eversana's NAVLIN database and converted to US dollars using 2025 exchange rates. Prices were adjusted using purchasing power parity. All prices were standardized to a 30-day equivalent supply following CMS methods. For drugs with multiple brands or strengths, weighted average per-unit prices were estimated using Medicare Part D utilization data.

resultsPostnegotiation MFPs were 15% to 60% (median: 38%) lower than estimated US net prices with greater reductions for drugs whose ceiling price was determined by the net price. However, MFPs remained 17% to 755% (median: 108%) higher than the average purchasing power parity-adjusted published list price in MFN reference countries. The mean US-to-international price ratio declined from 5.8 before negotiation to 3.3 afterward. Twelve of 14 drugs had MFPs below their estimated ceilings, whereas the 15th drug had an inestimable ceiling. There is not enough information about the proposed GLOBE and GUARD models to project MFN prices for Part B or D at this time. Discounts varied by therapeutic class and were larger for drugs with prior negotiated comparators.

conclusionsThe 2025 Medicare drug negotiations will generate meaningful reductions in domestic drug prices when they take effect in 2027 but left substantial disparities relative to peer nations. Upcoming MFN-based pricing models may exert further downward pressure, although their implementation and international effects warrant careful monitoring.

Indexed as

CommerceDrug CostsMedicare Part DNegotiatingPrescription DrugsHumansUnited StatesPrescription Drugs

Identifiers

PMID42043921
PMCPMC13119479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.