ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Patient Empowerment in the Context of Outpatient Surgery Using the Example of Orthopedics (Power-AOP): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shifting surgeries from the stationary to the outpatient setting is seen as a suitable way to increase efficiency in the health care system. A substantial increase in outpatient procedures can therefore be observed internationally-particularly in the field of orthopedics. However, the interests and needs of patients are often insufficiently taken into account in this process. The "Power-AOP" research project was initiated to identify the associated challenges in the area of patient empowerment and to develop solutions. Objective: Using the field of orthopedics as an example, the Power-AOP project investigates how patient empowerment can be strengthened in the context of outpatient surgery. Methods: Using a mixed methods approach, health policy recommendations will be developed that aim to strengthen patient empowerment in the context of outpatient surgery. The project is scheduled to run for 3 years and comprises 6 work packages, with a total of 10 modules. In the first step, a scoping review was carried out to map the existing literature. This is followed by focus groups and interviews with patients and health care providers to gain deeper insights into their experiences and perspectives. The results will be quantified using a questionnaire-based survey. In order to identify a suitable patient population for this survey, an analysis of claims data will be conducted beforehand. The results will then be discussed and refined in 2 stakeholder workshops with key players in the health care system. In the final phase, a concept will be developed that contains actionable recommendations for strengthening patient empowerment in the context of outpatient care. Results: The project began in April 2025. The claims data analysis and the scoping review have been completed, and a manuscript for the review is currently being prepared. The focus groups and interviews were conducted with 19 health care providers and 26 patients. Data analysis is in progress. The quantitative survey is planned for May 2026 to March 2027. The workshops are scheduled for the second and fourth quarters of 2027. The project will conclude with the final results in March 2028. Conclusions: This project will help to improve patient empowerment in the context of outpatient surgery. This allows patients to take a more active role in the process. On the one hand, this can lead to greater satisfaction with the process, particularly among patients. On the other hand, more active participation by patients can improve outcomes and prevent unnecessary readmissions or additional treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.