Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044261›Full record

ArticleJMIR diabetes2026

Integration of Continuous Glucose Monitoring With HbA

Michelle H Lee, Shihui Jin, Eveline Febriana, Maybritte Lim, Sonia Baig, Shahmir H Ali, Ian Yi Han Ang, Tze Ping Loh, Ashna Nastar, Kee Seng Chia and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR diabetes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michelle H Lee *Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore, 65 90012612.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2703-7308
Shihui Jin *Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0079-7390
Eveline FebrianaDepartment of Clinical and Translational Research Office, National Heart Centre, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-8912-1702
Maybritte LimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-1526-1180
Sonia BaigDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore, 65 90012612.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5195-3512
Shahmir H AliSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0360-3507
Ian Yi Han AngSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-3764
Tze Ping LohDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4272-0001
Ashna NastarDepartment of Medicine, Alexandra Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4921-1864
Kee Seng ChiaSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0629-5570
Alice Pik-Shan KongDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China (Hong Kong).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8927-6764
Faidon MagkosDepartment of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1312-7364
Alex R CookSaw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6271-5832
Sue-Anne TohDepartment of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, 10 Medical Drive, Singapore, 117597, Singapore, 65 90012612.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1570-4417

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a convenient tool to evaluate glycemic status but its ability to detect individuals at risk for type 2 diabetes is limited. Objective: Exploiting the glycemic variability captured in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), we used a well-characterized Asian cohort study from Singapore to assess whether utilizing CGM features in a machine learning model can improve the detection of prediabetes as compared to using HbA1c alone. Methods: In this study, 406 nondiabetic Asian participants underwent an oral glucose tolerance test and had their fasting and 2-hour plasma glucose concentrations measured, together with HbA1c, to classify them as with normoglycemia or prediabetes. They also wore a CGM sensor for 14 days. CGM profile features were extracted and prediction models were constructed with random subsampling validation to evaluate predictive efficacy. The use of CGM and HbA1c data alone or in combination was assessed for the ability to correctly distinguish prediabetes from normoglycemia. Results: In this cohort (N=406), 189 (46.6%) individuals had prediabetes. The majority of the cohort were women (n=236, 58.1%) and of Chinese ethnicity (n=267, 65.8%). Those with prediabetes were slightly older, heavier, and had higher glucose levels with more variability than the normoglycemia group. A 2-step approach was used where those with HbA1c ≥5.7% were automatically categorized as having prediabetes; the model then focused on the prediction capability of the CGM features among individuals with HbA1c <5.7%. The prediction models with CGM outperformed the benchmark for comparison defined by HbA1c ≥5.7%, where they yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.866-0.876, with a lower specificity of 78%-80% but a vastly improved sensitivity of 76%-78%. Conclusions: Adding CGM to HbA1c in a 2-step approach greatly improved the sensitivity of detecting prediabetes in an Asian population. Given the benefits to optimizing lifestyle behaviors and its growing acceptability among the nondiabetic population, CGM is a promising alternative for type 2 diabetes mellitus risk screening.

Indexed as

Asiancontinuous glucose monitoringglycated hemoglobinHbAmachine learningprediabetesscreening

Identifiers

PMID42044261
PMCPMC13118137

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.