Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42044932›Full record

ArticleLupus science & medicine2026

Evaluation of clinical, histological and biomarker response after initial therapy of lupus nephritis.

Danielle Christinne Egypto, Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto, Guilherme Pereira Carlesso, Luiz Antonio Moura, Luis E C Andrade, Debora Calderaro, Emilia Inoue Sato

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Lupus science & medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Danielle Christinne EgyptoUniversidade Federal da Paraiba, João Pessoa, Brazil.
Edgard Torres Dos Reis-NetoMedicine, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0657-4825
Guilherme Pereira CarlessoMedicine, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-0051-3424
Luiz Antonio MouraUniversidade Federal de Sao Paulo Hospital do Rim e Hipertensao, São Paulo, Brazil.
Luis E C AndradeMedicine, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Debora CalderaroUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5535-3223
Emilia Inoue SatoMedicine, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil eisato@unifesp.br.ORCID 0000-0001-8540-014X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PRIMARY

objectiveTo evaluate histopathological renal response in re-biopsy after induction therapy and to correlate with the Target Renal Response (TRR) and secondary objective: to correlate serum and urinary biomarkers with creatinine, 24-hour proteinuria, histological class, activity index and chronicity index.

methodsOpen, longitudinal, multicentre study in lupus nephritis (LN) confirmed through renal biopsy. Two kidney biopsies (T1 and T2) were performed. Laboratory evaluations included urinary sediment examination, renal function, 24-hour proteinuria, serum C3/C4, anti-dsDNA, antinucleosome, anticardiolipin immunoglobulin M/immunoglobulin G, other serum (anti-C1q, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP-1), lipocalin-associated neutrophil gelatinase (NGAL) and kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1)) and urinary biomarkers (tumour necrosis factor-related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), anti-interleukin 16, activated leucocyte cell adhesion molecule, MCP-1, NGAL, KIM-1, adiponectin, haemopexin and ceruloplasmin).

results24 patients (mean age 32.5±8.2 years) were studied. After induction therapy, 18 patients achieved TRR. Among six patients who did not reach TRR, three failed to meet the 24-hour proteinuria criterion, two to the creatinine criteria and one to both criteria. Histological response was achieved by 14 patients; among these, four patients did not reach the TRR. We found 12 discordances between clinical and histological responses. Eight patients achieved TRR without histological response and four patients achieved histological response without TRR. Serum NGAL and serum KIM-1 showed correlation with urea and with creatinine and higher levels of urinary TWEAK were found in patients who remained with abnormal haematuria at T2. However, no correlation of these new biomarkers was found with activity score or histological class in this study.

conclusionDiscordance between clinical and histological response was confirmed, more patients achieved clinical response than histological response and, even in patients with histological response, not everyone presented clinical response. In a short interval of time, we observed early reduction in proteinuria and change in histological class after induction therapy. The lack of correlation between biomarkers and baseline histological parameters, which is inconsistent with prior studies, renders the biomarker findings inconclusive.

Indexed as

Immunosuppressive AgentsKidneyLupus NephritisAdultBiomarkersBiopsyCreatinineFemaleHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1HumansLipocalin-2Longitudinal StudiesMaleProteinuriaTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultBiomarkersCreatinineHAVCR1 protein, humanHepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 1Immunosuppressive AgentsLCN2 protein, humanLipocalin-2AntibodiesLupus Erythematosus, SystemicLupus NephritisTherapeutics

Identifiers

PMID42044932
PMCPMC13141085

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.