ArticleScientific reports2026
Sustainable camel meat preservation using individual and synergistic essential oil bioactive compounds against Listeria monocytogenes.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Camel meat is an emerging and sustainable meat with a favorable nutritional profile; however, it is highly susceptible to microbial contamination, particularly Listeria monocytogenes. This study assessed the antimicrobial efficacy of four essential oil (EO) bioactive compounds—linalool, eugenol, α-pinene, and α-terpinene—used individually and in binary combinations against L. monocytogenes in vitro and in minced camel meat stored at 4 °C for 12 days. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) assays revealed that eugenol showed the strongest antibacterial activity (1.25 mg/mL), followed by linalool (5 mg/mL), while α-pinene and α-terpinene exhibited weak activity (40 mg/mL). Checkerboard analysis identified four synergistic combinations—linalool + α-pinene (LP), linalool + eugenol (LE), eugenol + α-pinene (EP), and eugenol + α-terpinene (ET)—with fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) values ≤ 0.5. Based on FICI findings, individual EO bioactive compounds (1% w/w) and their synergistic combinations (1% and 2% w/w) were incorporated into minced camel meat inoculated with L. monocytogenes. Eugenol achieved the highest individual reduction by day 12 (3.9 log CFU/g), followed by linalool (2.3 log CFU/g), while α-pinene and α-terpinene were ineffective. All 2% combinations completely inhibited L. monocytogenes from day 3 onward, and the LE1 treatment achieved complete inhibition by days 9 and 12. These findings highlight the strong potential of essential oil bioactive components, particularly their synergistic combinations, as promising natural interventions for enhancing the microbial safety of camel meat and warrant further exploration toward multiple strains, different pathogens and industrial application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.