ArticleScientific reports2026
Forced expiration: a simple technique that acutely increases core muscle contraction in mild chronic non-specific low back pain.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) is widely used to activate the transverse abdominis muscle (TrA). However, the ADIM technique might be challenging to understand and perform correctly, causing the compensation of the internal and external oblique muscles (IO and EO, respectively). The forced expiration (FE) technique has been proposed to activate TrA with minimal contraction of IO and EO. This study aimed to compare the muscle contraction of TrA, IO, and EO in individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP) between ADIM and FE techniques. This study used a crossover design. 15 individuals with mild CNLBP were recruited. Participants were asked to perform ADIM and FE in a random order. Ultrasound imaging was used to collect TrA, IO, and EO thickness at rest and during those techniques. These data were further used to calculate the percent change in muscle thickness from resting (%Change). A 2-way repeated measure ANOVA with post-hoc least significant difference (LSD) was performed to determine the effects of different techniques on lateral abdominal muscles. Results showed a significant technique*muscle interaction (P = 0.001), while post-hoc LSD demonstrated significant differences (P < 0.001) in %Change between TrA and IO, as well as TrA and EO for both techniques. However, the results showed that FE elicited a significantly greater TrA contraction than ADIM (P = 0.002). Findings indicate that both techniques can isolate the TrA from IO and EO, but the FE technique showed a greater %Change in TrA compared to the ADIM. These findings suggest that FE is a more potent maneuver for maximizing TrA contraction and may serve as a valuable alternative approach in core stabilization programs for individuals with mild CNLBP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.