Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42045504›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Stakeholder-driven assessment of optimal waste-to-energy plant selection in the Tamale metropolitan area using the analytical hierarchy process.

Abdul-Wahab Tahiru, Samuel Jerry Cobbina, Wilhemina Asare

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdul-Wahab TahiruDepartment of Environment and Sustainability Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box TL 1350, Tamale, Ghana. tahiru.abdulwahab21@uds.edu.gh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9891-3999
Samuel Jerry CobbinaDepartment of Environment and Sustainability Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box TL 1350, Tamale, Ghana.
Wilhemina AsareDepartment of Environment and Sustainability Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, University for Development Studies, P.O. Box TL 1350, Tamale, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Tamale Metropolitan Area in Northern Ghana faces growing challenges in municipal solid waste management and energy supply due to rapid urbanization and limited infrastructure. Environmentally sustainable and socially acceptable waste-to-energy (WtE) solutions offer a potential pathway to address these interconnected issues. This study evaluates the most suitable WtE technology for Tamale by incorporating stakeholder perspectives through a structured decision-making framework using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Four technologies, incineration, gasification, landfill gas recovery (LFG), and anaerobic digestion (AD) were assessed against environmental, economic, technical, and social criteria by municipal officials, environmental specialists, private sector actors, and community representatives. Results indicate that AD is the consistently preferred option, largely due to its environmental benefits, capacity to manage biodegradable waste, social acceptability, and potential for job creation. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of this preference, except when economic considerations dominate decision-making, where LFG becomes favorable. The findings highlight AD as a balanced, inclusive, and resilient WtE solution for Tamale, providing actionable guidance for local authorities, policymakers, and development partners seeking to implement community-supported, low-carbon energy strategies in urban centers across Sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

Anaerobic digestionGasificationIncinerationLandfill gas recoveryWaste-to-energy

Identifiers

PMID42045504
PMCPMC13284377

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.