ArticleBMC medicine2026
Prenatal computed tomography (CT) and risk of congenital heart disease and cerebral palsy: A nationwide mother-child paired cohort study.
Article in BMC medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging during pregnancy is increasing, the decision to use CT imaging remains challenging due to the conflicting considerations of the potential risks of fetal radiation and the medical benefits to the mother, with inconsistent evidence on offspring outcomes.
methodsNationwide retrospective cohort study based on the Korean National Health Insurance Service database, including 5,457,153 live births between 2005 and 2019. After 1:4 propensity score matching by maternal characteristics and diagnosis at the same gestational age, 13,307 CT-exposed and 42,946 unexposed pregnancies were included. CT exposure during pregnancy was identified using claims data from the last menstrual period to delivery. Estimated fetal radiation exposure was approximated based on anatomical scan location and categorized into lower and higher exposure groups, corresponding to non-abdominopelvic and abdominopelvic CT, respectively. Outcomes included major congenital malformations, congenital heart disease, and cerebral palsy identified using ICD-10 codes. Cox and logistic regression models were used, accounting for clustering by mother.
resultsAmong CT-exposed pregnancies, 37.0% occurred within 14 days post-last menstrual period (LMP), and no increased risk of malformations or cerebral palsy was observed in this group. However, CT exposure during the first trimester was associated with a higher risk of major congenital malformations (Odds ratio (OR) 1.14, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02–1.30) and cerebral palsy (Hazard ratio (HR) 2.10, 95% CI 1.48–2.97). In a sensitivity analysis, non-abdominopelvic CT was associated with congenital heart disease (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.03–1.47), but not with cerebral palsy, while abdominopelvic CT was associated with both congenital heart disease (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.12–1.92) and cerebral palsy (HR 2.04, 95% CI 1.08–3.84).
conclusionsEven diagnostic-level CT radiation exposure during pregnancy may be associated with increased risks of congenital and neurodevelopmental disorders. Current radiation safety thresholds based solely on carcinogenic risk may underestimate fetal developmental vulnerability. However, this study has limitations, particularly the potential for residual confounding related to clinical acuity at presentation, which may not be fully addressed despite restriction to similar diagnostic indications and extensive propensity score matching.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.