ArticleJournal of translational internal medicine2026
Identifying transdiagnostic neurobiomarkers for precision major psychiatric disorders
Article in Journal of translational internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnostic criteria of psychiatric disorders rest solely on symptoms rather than etiologies; this led to the lack of objective biomarkers for diagnosis, differential diagnosis and treatment of major psychiatric disorders (MPDs) including schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, and major depressive disorder. Facing this bottleneck problem, we firstly started our review from the evolution of psychiatric nosology for the diagnosis of MPDs which refined from categorical to dimensional classification. Specifically, the neuroimaging was sought as an intermediate phenotype to solve the dilemma introduced from a symptom-based diagnostic classification framework. Secondly, we reviewed findings applying traditional mass-univariate methods as well as machine learning methods to identify the diagnostic and treatment neurobiomarkers for MPDs from group level to individual level, and suggested the frontal-posterior functional imbalanced pattern as a potential transdiagnostic neurobiomarker for MPDs. We further initialized the necessity of using unsupervised learning approach for MPDs subtyping prior to performing supervised learning for classification, as seeking one single neurobiological feature should be incapable of coping with the strong heterogeneity in MPDs. We concluded that the ultimate goal of MPDs subtyping is to identify an objective neurobiomarker to guide clinical practice; based on frontal-posterior functional imbalance, we developed a subtyping and precise neuromodulation strategy to achieve the establishment of a precision medicine framework. Future studies should perform more etiological investigations based on this neurobiomarker, and conduct randomized controlled trials in larger MPDs populations for further verification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.