ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Influencing Factors of Dietary Guidance Compliance in Patients with Esophageal Cancer During Preoperative Neoadjuvant Therapy: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Experiences and Food Avoidance Behavior in Patients Following Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the factors influencing dietary guidance adherence in esophageal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy and to understand their decision-making process through the theoretical lens of the health belief model (HBM). Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted via in depth, semistructured interviews. A purposive sample of 15 esophageal cancer patients receiving preoperative neoadjuvant therapy was recruited until data saturation was achieved. The data were analyzed via directed content analysis, guided by the core constructs of the HBM. Results: Six categories and fifteen subcategories were identified: perceived susceptibility (intuitive perception of body signals, risk awareness via medical information); perceived severity (insufficient threat recognition, awareness of malnutrition-related harm); perceived benefits (improving physical condition, promoting disease recovery); perceived barriers (treatment-related side effects, economic burden, psychological distress, conflicts in dietary habits); self-efficacy (empowerment strategies of highly efficacious individuals, the helplessness of those with low efficacy); and cues to action (professional nutritional education, family supervision and support, peer support). Conclusion: This study suggests that clinical medical workers should fully recognize the impact of personal health beliefs on dietary behavior compliance. This study provides a robust, theory-driven evidence base for developing targeted, multicomponent nutritional interventions that are fundamentally patient-centered, with the ultimate goal of improving treatment tolerance, surgical outcomes, and overall survival.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.