Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42046997›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2026

Satisfaction and Decisional Regret After Mesh Versus Non-Mesh Apical Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery.

Helena Bryans, Akash Sharma, Nitya Abraham

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helena BryansAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1339-1127
Akash SharmaDepartment of Urology and Obstetrics & Gynecology and Women's Health, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.
Nitya AbrahamDepartment of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8304-4388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition that can have a significant impact on a woman's quality of life. While surgical success is often measured objectively, patient-centered metrics are equally important.

objectiveThis study investigated satisfaction, decisional regret, and sexual function in patients who underwent POP surgery with or without mesh to better understand how patients define success. STUDY

designThis is a retrospective review of patients who underwent apical POP surgery from 2015 to 2023 at a single institution serving an ethnically diverse community. Demographic data were collected through chart review and surveys conducted via telephone calls. Patient satisfaction and decisional regret were measured with the validated modified Satisfaction with Decision Scale-Decision Regret Scale for pelvic floor disorders. Sexual function after surgery was measured with the validated 6-question Female Sexual Function Index and open-ended sexual health questions. Patients were compared by use of mesh during surgery (e.g., sacrocolpopexy) versus native tissue repair. Fischer's exact test was used to compare categorical variables and t-tests used to compare continuous variables with p < 0.05 as significant.

resultsOf the 250 women contacted who underwent POP surgery between 2015 and 2023, 110 (44%) participated, with a median follow-up of 970 days (IQR 843). Forty (36%) and 70 (64%) patients underwent mesh versus native tissue repair, respectively. There were no significant differences in satisfaction (p = 0.52) and regret (p = 0.83) between mesh and non-mesh groups. Patients who experienced moderate-to-severe decisional regret were significantly more likely to report regret regarding undergoing hysterectomy (p = 0.03) and not having had mesh placed at the time of their POP surgery (p < 0.01), compared to those with mild regret. Fifteen patients (16%) reported sexual health concerns, which were significantly associated with lower satisfaction (p < 0.01).

conclusionsPatients who underwent POP surgery had low regret and high satisfaction with their decision at almost 3 years of follow-up. Regret and satisfaction did not significantly differ based on the use of mesh. Although overall regret was low, open-ended responses revealed nuanced concerns about hysterectomy, mesh, and sexual health, suggesting limitations of current assessment tools. Overall, this study highlights how patient-centered metrics could augment the determination of surgical success and better inform decision-making in patients considering POP surgery.

Indexed as

Decision MakingEmotionsGynecologic Surgical ProceduresPatient SatisfactionPelvic Organ ProlapseSurgical MeshAgedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment Outcomemeshpelvic organ prolapseregretsatisfactionsexual function

Identifiers

PMID42046997
PMCPMC13387942

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.