ArticlePsychological medicine2026
Modulating empathy with tDCS: dissociable roles of rTPJ and lDLPFC.
Article in Psychological medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEmpathy relies on distinct but interacting processes for representing others' states and regulating self-oriented affect. Neuroimaging studies implicate the right temporoparietal junction (rTPJ) in perspective-taking and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (lDLPFC) in emotion regulation, yet causal evidence from neuromodulation remains limited. This study compared the effects of rTPJ- and lDLPFC-targeted transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on empathy across multiple contexts and modalities.
methodsIn Study 1, participants performed a static pain empathy task following anodal or sham tDCS over the rTPJ or lDLPFC, with electroencephalography recorded. In Study 2, participants viewed autobiographical videos depicting positive, negative, and neutral events before and after stimulation, while heart rate variability (HRV) was assessed. Machine learning-based decoding integrated behavioral and physiological data to evaluate the 'readability' of empathic states.
resultsrTPJ-tDCS enhanced cognitive empathy across tasks, increasing empathic ratings and late positive potential amplitudes in the pain empathy task, and enhancing the subjective sense of content and emotion understanding in the video task. lDLPFC-tDCS selectively increased HRV in the video task, consistent with greater autonomic flexibility, without altering explicit ratings. Decoding analyses converged with these findings: rTPJ stimulation increased classification accuracy of targets' emotional states, indicating stronger alignment between empathic responses and others' emotional cues, whereas lDLPFC stimulation reduced accuracy, suggesting regulation-related attenuation of overt emotional signals.
conclusionsThese findings provide causal evidence for rTPJ supporting cross-context cognitive empathy and lDLPFC modulating autonomic regulation. Multi-context, multimodal assessment delineated distinct target-specific profiles, informing precision neuromodulation strategies for empathy-related deficits and regulation needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.