Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047464›Full record

SynthesisHealth promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals2026

Impact of Different Types of Sedentary Behaviour on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.

Tawan Ricardo de Jesus Silva, Eduarda Pereira Damião, Vanessa Santos Barbosa, Lara de Matos Alcantara, Rafaela Gomes Dos Santos, Jair Sindra Virtuoso Junior

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Impact of Different Types of Sedentary Behaviour on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tawan Ricardo de Jesus SilvaGraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-1063-9525
Eduarda Pereira DamiãoGraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1576-0809
Vanessa Santos BarbosaDepartment of Education (DEDC 10), State University of Bahia (UNEB), Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6210-8913
Lara de Matos AlcantaraGraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2332-0296
Rafaela Gomes Dos SantosDepartment of Education (DEDC 10), State University of Bahia (UNEB), Teixeira de Freitas, Bahia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7361-0078
Jair Sindra Virtuoso JuniorGraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro (UFTM), Uberaba, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7602-1789

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issue addressedSedentary behaviour (SB) is a relevant determinant of health in ageing, yet its effects on cognitive function remain inconclusive. The literature often treats SB as a homogeneous exposure, without considering that different sedentary activities may differentially affect cognitive domains. Accordingly, this study sought to identify how distinct types of SB influence cognition in older adults.

methodsA systematic review was conducted and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42025637160), following PRISMA guidelines. Observational studies published between 2010 and 2025 were included if they involved participants aged 60 years or older and examined the relationship between specific types of SB and cognitive domains. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science and Scopus. Two independent reviewers carried out study selection, data extraction and quality assessment using Joanna Briggs Institute tools.

resultsThe search yielded 1795 records, resulting in the inclusion of 13 studies encompassing 43 902 participants. Findings were heterogeneous: passive SB, particularly, television viewing, was more frequently associated with poorer cognitive performance. In contrast, cognitively stimulating sedentary activities involving complex tasks-such as reading, playing games and computer use-were positively associated with memory, executive function and processing speed. Some studies further suggested that cognitive engagement may mitigate potential negative effects of SB.

conclusionsThe findings indicate that the impact of SB on cognition depends more on the type of activity performed than on total sedentary time, underscoring the importance of context and mental demand. SO WHAT?: Identifying which types of SB are beneficial or harmful may inform health promotion strategies, encouraging older adults to replace passive SB with cognitively stimulating sedentary activities, thereby supporting healthier cognitive ageing.

Indexed as

CognitionSedentary BehaviorAgedAgingExecutive FunctionHumansMemorycognitioncognitive ageinglife styleolder adultssedentary behaviour

Identifiers

PMID42047464
PMCPMC13123304

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.