Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047765›Full record

ReviewPediatric radiology2026

Application of artificial intelligence in paediatric oncology imaging.

Giulia De Donno, Isabelle S A de Vries, Laura M E Adriaansen, Arthur J A T Braat, Simone A J Ter Horst, Geert O Janssens, Bart de Keizer, Alexander Leemans, Johannes H M Merks, Rutger A J Nievelstein and 3 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Giulia De DonnoDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands. g.dedonno@umcutrecht.nl.
Isabelle S A de VriesPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Laura M E AdriaansenPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Arthur J A T BraatPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Simone A J Ter HorstPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Geert O JanssensPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Bart de KeizerPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alexander LeemansDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Johannes H M MerksDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rutger A J NievelsteinPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alida F W van der SteegPrincess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Alberto De LucaDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Rick R van RijnDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paediatric oncology relies heavily on medical imaging for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal disease monitoring. Yet the field faces unique challenges, including a limited number of patients, diverse anatomy, motion artefacts, and a global shortage of subspecialised radiologists. These constraints can compromise diagnostic accuracy, prolong workflows, and increase the risk of errors, highlighting a critical need for innovative solutions. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool capable of enhancing the entire imaging pipeline. From acquisition to reporting, AI-driven methods show potential to improve image quality, correct motion artefacts, harmonise multicentre datasets, and accelerate scans while reducing radiation exposure. Deep learning models and radiomics have been shown capable of precise tumour segmentation, early lesion detection, and classification, while integration with clinical and molecular data supports individualised staging, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making. Beyond analysis, natural language processing and large language models can streamline report generation and clinical documentation, potentially enabling more efficient communication and workflow optimisation. Despite these advances, paediatric applications remain constrained by small, heterogeneous datasets, limited paediatric-specific models, and challenges in generalisability, explainability, and regulatory approval. Strategies such as model generalisation across new datasets, the development of retrainable generic models, privacy-preserving training, and synthetic data generation can help overcome these barriers, thereby improving model robustness and promoting equity in care. By augmenting rather than replacing radiologists, AI holds the potential to transform paediatric oncology imaging, improving diagnostic precision, workflow efficiency, and enhancing access to high-quality care. Continued collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, and regulatory bodies will be essential to realise this promise safely and effectively.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceChildrenOncologyRadiology

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.