ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Application of artificial intelligence in paediatric oncology imaging.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Paediatric oncology relies heavily on medical imaging for diagnosis, treatment planning, and longitudinal disease monitoring. Yet the field faces unique challenges, including a limited number of patients, diverse anatomy, motion artefacts, and a global shortage of subspecialised radiologists. These constraints can compromise diagnostic accuracy, prolong workflows, and increase the risk of errors, highlighting a critical need for innovative solutions. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool capable of enhancing the entire imaging pipeline. From acquisition to reporting, AI-driven methods show potential to improve image quality, correct motion artefacts, harmonise multicentre datasets, and accelerate scans while reducing radiation exposure. Deep learning models and radiomics have been shown capable of precise tumour segmentation, early lesion detection, and classification, while integration with clinical and molecular data supports individualised staging, prognosis, and therapeutic decision-making. Beyond analysis, natural language processing and large language models can streamline report generation and clinical documentation, potentially enabling more efficient communication and workflow optimisation. Despite these advances, paediatric applications remain constrained by small, heterogeneous datasets, limited paediatric-specific models, and challenges in generalisability, explainability, and regulatory approval. Strategies such as model generalisation across new datasets, the development of retrainable generic models, privacy-preserving training, and synthetic data generation can help overcome these barriers, thereby improving model robustness and promoting equity in care. By augmenting rather than replacing radiologists, AI holds the potential to transform paediatric oncology imaging, improving diagnostic precision, workflow efficiency, and enhancing access to high-quality care. Continued collaboration between clinicians, data scientists, and regulatory bodies will be essential to realise this promise safely and effectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42047765What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.