Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42047882›Full record

ReviewCurrent psychiatry reports2026

A Scoping Review of Interventions and Available Programs for Justice-Involved Women with Substance Use Disorders.

Sophia C Scott, Nicole A Barbaro, Emma H Lu, Kaitlin Shannon, Christine E Grella, Shelly F Greenfield

Abstract readScoping ReviewReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current psychiatry reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sophia C ScottHarvard College, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1219-9997
Nicole A BarbaroDivision of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-7892-8662
Emma H LuHarvard College, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Kaitlin ShannonHarvard College, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Christine E GrellaIntegrated Substance Abuse Programs, UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0664-3248
Shelly F GreenfieldDivision of Alcohol, Drugs, and Addiction, McLean Hospital, 115 Mill Street, Belmont, MA, 02478, USA. sgreenfield@mclean.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9387-1416

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review scopes existing research examining substance use-related services for women in carceral settings. The paper focuses on gender-specific care and programs not specifically tailored for women that analyze results by gender. The paper also suggests recommendations for future research based on identified gaps in the literature. RECENT

findingsExisting literature indicates that there has been a dramatic increase in the number of women in correctional settings over the past four decades. Compared to women in the general population, those in correctional settings have high rates of substance use disorders (SUDs) and upon release, experience elevated risk of returning to substance use, drug overdose, and re-incarceration. Incarcerated women also present with more severe substance use histories and co-occurring mental-health and trauma-related needs than incarcerated men, factors associated with higher return to substance use and overdose risk. While programs accessible to incarcerated women exist, there is limited literature comparing their distinct features. Evidence garnered from eight heterogeneous studies indicate that more intensive and gender-responsive programs, along with interventions that facilitate treatment linkage post-release, were associated with greater treatment engagement and reduced return to substance use. However, effects on recidivism and long-term individual outcomes were inconsistent and limited by methodological weaknesses. Future research should evaluate the barriers to integrated gender-responsive SUD treatment for women in carceral settings to inform the implementation of tailored services.

Indexed as

Health Services for PrisonersPrisonersSubstance-Related DisordersFemaleHumansCommunity re-entryInterventionsJustice systemSubstance useTreatment programsWomen

Identifiers

PMID42047882

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.