Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049232›Full record

ReviewNucleic acids research2026

On the molecular basis of enduring memory in neurons, and cell fate in fibroblasts.

Peter R Cook

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nucleic acids research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter R CookThe Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford; Oxford, OX1 3RE, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6639-188X

Funding

University of Oxford
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Memories can last a lifetime, and how this is achieved remains an unanswered challenge. Most current thinking sees molecular traces of memories (engrams) as sets of synaptic proteins facilitating neuronal co-firing and co-wiring. However, most proteins turn over in months or less. Another challenge is how fibroblasts remember their cell fate for decades, and an emerging model sees functionally related genes co-firing in clusters (called transcription factories and condensates) that make RNAs specifying cell fate. As clustering is driven by entropic forces acting throughout time, the first cells may have possessed this memory system, and Nature could have exploited it to store engrams when nervous systems evolved. Then, transcription creates the naïve neuronal substrate and defines which cells are included in co-wiring and co-firing circuits, before progressive cell differentiation consolidates long-term memories. I speculate that transcription plays another central role. For every nucleotide added to a nascent RNA, transcription generates a pyrophosphate-a chelating agent that sequesters the calcium ions that can modify action-potential spike-trains. In other words, the same nano-wired DNA computer that specifies cell fate could store and manipulate our memories.

Indexed as

FibroblastsMemoryNeuronsAnimalsCell DifferentiationHumansRNATranscription, GeneticRNA

Identifiers

PMID42049232
PMCPMC13122173

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.