ArticleBMJ open2026
Senior management's understanding of and response to climate goals in healthcare: a qualitative study in a Swedish hospital.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealthcare is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions, and sector-specific policies and goals are recommended as governance tools. Despite leadership playing a critical role in reducing emissions, there is limited empirical research on how healthcare managers perceive and navigate climate goals and actions.
objectiveTo explore how members of a hospital's senior management team understand and respond to climate goals.
designQualitative study design, semi-structured interviews were conducted, and data were analysed thematically.
settingA hospital in Sweden.
participantsMembers (n=15) of the hospital's senior management team.
resultsFive themes were identified. Senior managers recognised the importance of climate goals (theme 1), but their understanding of these varied-from perceiving them as concrete and actionable to abstract and irrelevant at the departmental level (theme 2). Climate goals were described as both visible and invisible (theme 3), and as both in alignment and in competition with other organisational goals (eg, patient safety, budget constraints) (theme 4). There was a common understanding that they, and the hospital, could do more to reduce emissions but knowledge gaps, limited resources, monitoring challenges, as well as systemic constraints, challenged advancement (theme 5). These dynamics led to two co-existing patterns of responses: a
conclusionsClimate goals can act as both catalysts and inhibitors to climate actions in hospitals, depending on how they are understood and operationalised by senior managers. Policymakers and healthcare system leaders must address the uncertainty surrounding climate goals to advance climate action.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.