ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)
Comparison of Early Response to Selumetinib Therapy in Adolescents and Children With NF1-related Plexiform Neurofibromas.
Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
aimFollowing approval from the European Medicines Agency, selumetinib has emerged as a targeted therapy for pediatric patients aged ≥3 years with inoperable, symptomatic NF1-related plexiform neurofibromas (PNs). In Poland, this treatment has been reimbursed since January 2024 under a national therapeutic program funded by the National Health Service. Nevertheless, the efficacy and safety of selumetinib in subgroups within the pediatric population remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of selumetinib treatment in adolescents (≥16 years old) compared with younger children with NF1-related PNs. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 111 patients were included in the program over a two-year period. Patients were divided into two groups according to age: adolescents (≥16 years of age) and children (<16 years of age). Demographic characteristics, PN location, treatment efficacy and adverse effects were analyzed and compared between the two groups.
resultsResponse rates at the first and second evaluation time point were similar between the groups. However, at the third time point, the response rate was significantly higher in children
conclusionEarly response to selumetinib therapy is achieved faster in children than in adolescents. Selumetinib is generally well tolerated in both age groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.