Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049889›Full record

ReviewNpj biological timing and sleep2026

Revitalizing the "biology" in "chronobiology".

Carl Hirschie Johnson, Charlotte Helfrich-Förster, Roelof A Hut, Sarah E Reece, William J Schwartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Npj biological timing and sleep, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Carl Hirschie JohnsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA. carl.h.johnson@vanderbilt.edu.
Charlotte Helfrich-FörsterNeurobiology and Genetics, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Roelof A HutChronobiology Unit, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Science, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Sarah E ReeceInstitute of Ecology and Evolution & Institute of Immunology and Infection Research, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
William J SchwartzChronobiology Unit, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Science, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. william.schwartz@austin.utexas.edu.

Funding

NWO consortium grant NWA1292.19.077U.S.A. National Institutes of Health R37GM067152, R01GM107434, R01NS104497, 0026; R21MH116150Wellcome Trust Discovery Award 227904/Z/23/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies of biological timekeeping have now matured from investigations of a fascinating and ubiquitous phenomenon into a discipline with practical applications; the excitement surrounding such translation has been overwhelming, perhaps at the expense of eclipsing further pursuit of basic research. Here we advocate that the ultimate success of applying chronobiological principles to address human and environmental needs will depend on the continued support of a robust agenda of fundamental research.

Identifiers

PMID42049889
PMCPMC13125519

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.