Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42049983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A chlorine releasing solution as an alternative for dental biofilm control.

Paula Yhorrana Viana Telles, Viviane de Cássia Oliveira, Rocio Geng Vivanco, Carolina Noronha Ferraz de Arruda, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Paula Yhorrana Viana TellesDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FORP-USP), Av. Do Café, s/n. Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Viviane de Cássia OliveiraDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FORP-USP), Av. Do Café, s/n. Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil.
Rocio Geng VivancoAcademic Department of Clinical Stomatology, Faculty of Stomatology, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Carolina Noronha Ferraz de ArrudaDepartment of Dental Prosthodontics, Dental School of Rio de Janeiro State University, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Fernanda de Carvalho PanzeriDepartment of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FORP-USP), Av. Do Café, s/n. Monte Alegre, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil. ferpanzeri@usp.br.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2023/14376-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the antibiofilm activity of a chlorine-releasing solution (CRS) and its in vitro effects on enamel color stability, surface roughness, and microhardness. A mixed biofilm composed of Staphylococcus aureus, Candida albicans, and Streptococcus mutans was formed on standardized bovine enamel specimens (6 × 6 × 2 mm). After 48 h of maturation, the specimens were immersed for 5 min in CRS (Granudacyn, Mölnlycke Health Care), 0.12% chlorhexidine (CHX, positive control), or phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, negative control). Antibiofilm activity was determined by colony-forming unit counts (CFU/mL). For enamel property evaluation, new specimens were treated once daily for 30 s using immersion or spray protocols. Color changes (ΔE₀₀), roughness (ΔRa), and microhardness (ΔKHN) were assessed at 1, 7, 15, and 30 days. CRS significantly reduced microbial counts compared with PBS and showed activity comparable to CHX. Surface roughness remained stable across treatments, except for CHX spray at 30 days (p < 0.05). CRS immersion resulted in lower microhardness values than PBS but did not differ from CHX. At 30 days, CHX spray produced the highest microhardness reduction (p < 0.05). No significant differences in color were observed among treatments. CRS demonstrated antimicrobial activity comparable to CHX without greater alterations in enamel surface properties under the tested conditions.

Indexed as

BiofilmsChlorineAnimalsCandida albicansCattleChlorhexidineDental EnamelHardnessStaphylococcus aureusStreptococcus mutansSurface PropertiesChlorhexidineChlorineBiofilmsChlorine compoundsColor stabilityMicrohardnessSurface roughness

Identifiers

PMID42049983
PMCPMC13287605

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.