ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2026
General health versus tumor stage: determinants of survival in Merkel cell carcinoma assessed by sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeOverall survival (OS) of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) patients is strongly influenced by health. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is recommended for staging. We evaluated whether SLNB is associated with OS in clinically node-negative MCC and contrasted tumor factors with patient frailty.
methodsSTROBE-compliant cohort across eight centers in Germany (2004–2024). We included 271 primary stage I–II MCC; 167 underwent SLNB and 104 did not. The primary outcome was OS; disease-specific survival (DSS) and progression-free probability (PFP) were secondary. Kaplan–Meier and Cox models were used. Confounding by indication was addressed with 1:1 propensity score matching and sensitivity analyses.
resultsPatients receiving SLNB were younger (median 74 vs 82 years; p < 0.001) and less comorbid (Charlson 4 vs 5). Ten-year OS was 69.5% with SLNB versus 45.2% without (log-rank p < 0.0001); unadjusted HR 0.34 (95% CI 0.20–0.59). In the matched cohort, SLNB remained associated with lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34–0.93; p = 0.024). DSS did not differ (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.55–2.13; p= 0.81). For PFP, unadjusted curves favored SLNB (p=0.0045), but the matched analysis was not significant (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.23–1.26). Sensitivity analyses suggested benefit: overlap weighting HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.33–0.73; p = 0.00045) and a stage-restricted match HR 0.36 (95% CI 0.13–0.99; p= 0.048).
conclusionsSLNB was associated with improved OS after adjustment, supporting its role in staging and risk stratification. The absence of DSS and matched PFP differences highlights the influence of overall health; residual confounding by indication cannot be excluded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.