Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42050539›Full record

ArticlePediatric rheumatology online journal2026

Markerless gait analysis for children and adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis using a machine learning pipeline.

Aseem Behl, Dominik Papies, Winfried Ilg, Mareen Kraft, Andrea Bevot, Sandra Hansmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric rheumatology online journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aseem BehlFaculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Tübingen, Nauklerstr. 47, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Dominik PapiesFaculty of Economics and Social Sciences, University of Tübingen, Nauklerstr. 47, 72074, Tübingen, Germany.
Winfried IlgSection Computational Sensomotorics, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Otfried-Müller-Str. 27, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Mareen KraftClinic for Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Neuropaediatrics, General Paediatrics, Diabetology, Endocrinology, Social Paediatrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Andrea BevotClinic for Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Neuropaediatrics, General Paediatrics, Diabetology, Endocrinology, Social Paediatrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, 72076, Tübingen, Germany.
Sandra HansmannClinic for Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Department of Neuropaediatrics, General Paediatrics, Diabetology, Endocrinology, Social Paediatrics, University Hospital Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 1, 72076, Tübingen, Germany. sandra.hansmann@med.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMusculoskeletal diseases, such as Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA), can lead to altered joint mobility and changes in gait pattern. While marker-based motion capture systems are considered the gold standard, their use is limited by high costs, technical complexity, time-intensive procedures, and specialized staff requirements. This study proposes and evaluates the feasibility of a markerless gait analysis approach for children of all ages, based on a machine learning pipeline, validates it against marker-based systems, and describes JIA-related gait differences.

methodsSagittal-plane gait videos were recorded using a standardized setup. A Mask R-CNN-based detector generated a bounding box around the body in each video frame. Within this box, a TCFormer model identified positions of predefined anatomical landmarks. Joint angles were computed from these landmarks on a frame-by-frame basis and assembled into continuous gait cycle trajectories. For validation, a subset of 12 participants was recorded simultaneously using a marker-based motion capture system and conventional video-recording. To ensure direct comparability between the two methods, physical markers in video-recordings were automatically detected and removed using a deep learning-based object detection and inpainting approach. Statistical comparisons were performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping. The estimated kinematic data were compared between JIA patients with lower-extremity involvement and typically developing (TD) peers, stratified by age and disease activity.

resultsVideos from 108 participants (60 JIA; 48 TD; age 1.8–17.4 years) were included. There was robust agreement between joint movement patterns of the markerless and the marker-based approach. Across all age groups, JIA patients with active arthritis had a reduced knee range of motion compared to TD (46.3[Formula: see text] vs. 49.8[Formula: see text]). Overall, differences in joint angle trajectories between groups remained limited.

conclusionsThe proposed single-camera, markerless pipeline can provide reliable and valid gait data using standard video equipment in children. Differences in gait patterns between JIA patients and TD peers were generally small, likely due to effective disease control. This method is adaptable across all ages, may facilitate enhanced gait monitoring, increase knowledge of functional abnormalities in JIA, and support therapeutic decisions. In the long run, it may also reduce costs by lowering infrastructure and setup requirements.

Indexed as

Arthritis, JuvenileGaitGait AnalysisMachine LearningAdolescentBiomechanical PhenomenaChildChild, PreschoolFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMotion CaptureVideo RecordingClinical monitoringDeep learningGait analysisJuvenile Idiopathic ArthritisMarkerless motion capture

Identifiers

PMID42050539
PMCPMC13126831

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.