ArticleCommunity dentistry and oral epidemiology2026
De-Implementing Low-Value Care in Dentistry: The Case for Choosing Wisely Campaigns.
Article in Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
De-implementation refers to the practice within implementation science that targets reducing low-value care; that is practices that have been proven to be outdated, unnecessary, potentially harmful and in some cases not cost-efficient. Reducing and removing habitual practices, as well as introducing new care, is not easy, as there are multiple provider, patient and system related factors that can hinder these efforts. The Choosing Wisely campaigns have been one of the ways that de-implementation of low-value care has been targeted. Choosing Wisely campaigns consist of recommendations that are implemented through specialty-specific guidance that can be used by providers, patients and the healthcare systems. While Choosing Wisely campaigns have gained widespread traction in medicine, the spread to oral health has been comparatively limited. This commentary explores some of the existing Choosing Wisely campaign recommendations within dentistry and takes a close look at how overprescription, overtreatment, overtesting, and the inclusion and prioritization of care are addressed through these campaigns. Current Choosing Wisely recommendations provide a useful basis that can be utilized to foster a broader movement towards the de-implementation of low-value care in dentistry, thereby facilitating substantive changes in oral health practice, policy, and service delivery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.