ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Association between glycemic variability and the risk of acute kidney injury in patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study with independent cohort analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication among critically ill patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Glycemic variability (GV), reflecting short-term fluctuations in blood glucose, may contribute to organ dysfunction; however, its relationship with AKI in ICU patients with TBI remains incompletely characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the MIMIC-IV database, including 2,151 adult ICU patients with TBI, and performed replication in an independent cohort of 265 patients to evaluate reproducibility and incremental prognostic value. GV was quantified as the coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose measurements obtained during ICU stay until the occurrence of AKI or ICU discharge. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine the association between GV and AKI, with stepwise adjustment for potential confounders. Predictive performance was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, while dose-response relationships were explored with restricted cubic spline models. The incremental prognostic utility of adding GV to SOFA- and APACHE II-based models was evaluated using calibration plots, decision curve analysis, Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), and Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). Results: AKI occurred in 59.1% (1,271/2,151) of patients in the MIMIC-IV cohort. Higher GV was independently associated with AKI across all adjusted models (fully adjusted model: OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.34). ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve of 0.73 (95% CI 0.71-0.75) with 66% sensitivity and 69.7% specificity. Restricted cubic spline analyses suggested an approximately linear increase in AKI risk with rising GV. The association was consistent across prespecified subgroups, robust to adjustment for glucose monitoring intensity, and replicated in the independent cohort. Incorporating GV into SOFA- and APACHE II-based models led to modest but statistically significant improvements in risk stratification. Conclusion: In ICU patients with TBI, greater glycemic variability is independently associated with subsequent AKI and provides incremental prognostic information beyond established severity scores. These findings highlight the potential utility of GV as a complementary marker for risk stratification. Prospective studies using standardized GV definitions and harmonized glucose monitoring strategies are warranted to confirm these results and clarify their clinical implications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.