Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42051841›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Male Breast Carcinoma in an Elderly Patient: A Rare Presentation and the Importance of Individualized Management.

Winthrop Pereira, Ravi Krishnappa, Sumith Deep, Ashima Puri

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Winthrop PereiraGeneral Surgery, JSS Hospital, Mysuru, IND.
Ravi KrishnappaSurgical Oncology, JSS Hospital, Mysuru, IND.
Sumith DeepSurgical Oncology, JSS Hospital, Mysuru, IND.
Ashima PuriGeneral Surgery, JSS Hospital, Mysuru, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male breast carcinoma (MBC) is a rare malignancy and often presents at an advanced stage due to low awareness and social stigma. Management is largely extrapolated from female breast cancer and must be individualized, particularly in elderly patients. An 87-year-old male patient presented with a painless left breast lump since three months and an ulcer over the nipple for since one month. Examination revealed a firm retroareolar mass with a healed ulcer over the lower aspect of the nipple and no palpable axillary lymphadenopathy. Imaging suggested a suspicious lesion, and core needle biopsy confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma. Staging workup with fludeoxyglucose-18 (FDG) positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) showed no distant metastasis. The patient underwent a modified radical mastectomy with axillary lymph node dissection. Histopathology revealed Grade II invasive ductal carcinoma with nodal involvement (pT4bN1a, Stage IIIB). Immunohistochemistry demonstrated estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negativity, and a low proliferative index, consistent with a luminal A subtype. Following multidisciplinary tumour board discussion, adjuvant chemotherapy was omitted, considering advanced age and performance status. The patient was treated with tamoxifen and adjuvant chest wall + axillary radiotherapy. At follow-up, he remains disease-free with a good quality of life. This case highlights the importance of early suspicion in male breast lesions and emphasizes individualized management integrating tumor biology, stage, and patient factors.

Indexed as

cancerchemotherapygeriatric oncolologyinvasive ductal breast carcinomamale breast carcinomamodified radical mastectomymodified radical mastectomy (mrm)

Identifiers

PMID42051841
PMCPMC13120317

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.