ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
The CIRCULAR model: advancing public health through citizen science initiated clinical and mechanistic research in atrial fibrillation.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Citizen science is a transformative approach to advancing health research by bridging the gap between researchers and the public. The Dutch CIRCULAR model, which addresses atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide, offers a unique example of applying citizen science in biomedical and public health research. The project was established to systematically include people with AF and their families as partners in research, ensuring that their lived experiences inform priorities, study designs, and interventions. A central role is played by the online health community of the AFIP foundation, which engages the AF community through blog articles, forums, social media, and outreach campaigns. These activities stimulate dialogue, enhance health literacy, empower individuals to contribute hypotheses and solutions, and function as a marketing strategy to attract and retain diverse participants. By sharing outcomes through open-access formats and direct communication with participants, CIRCULAR creates a feedback loop between citizens and researchers that fuels new research directions in AF. Early activities have demonstrated the value of this approach. Patient-reported triggers and suppressors of AF episodes, including psychological stress and lifestyle factors, informed laboratory investigations and led to the co-design of clinical interventions such as dietary programs. These examples illustrate how co-creation can shape both preclinical and clinical research as well as citizen and student education. This review discusses how citizen science is conceptualized and implemented in the CIRCULAR model, presents ongoing and future activities, and reflects on the added value of patient involvement for public health and biomedical innovation. By embedding citizens throughout the research process, and actively engaging them through targeted outreach, CIRCULAR advances patient-centered innovation, strengthens empowerment and health literacy, and provides lessons for future participatory initiatives in complex chronic disease research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.