ReviewRevista de neurologia2026
Peripheral Neuropathy: A Phenotype-Driven Review for Diagnosis and Management.
Review in Revista de neurologia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Modulation of Mu-Opioid Receptor Expression and Functional Impairment of Natural Killer Cells in Neuropathic Pain: Implications for Biomarker Discovery and Personalized Therapies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this narrative review is to provide a clinic-ready synthesis of contemporary concepts in peripheral neuropathy, spanning epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment, with emphasis on high-yield advances applicable to daily practice. The authors integrate pragmatic tools-including a diagnostic algorithm, suggested initial laboratory panels, and commonly used outcome measures-to support clinical decision-making. However, this review is intended as a clinic-oriented synthesis rather than a formal practice guideline. Peripheral neuropathy can be systematically categorized into seven pathophysiologic phenotypes-(1) distal "dying-back" axonopathy, (2) neuronopathy (ganglionopathy), (3) demyelinating neuropathies, (4) small-fiber neuropathy, (5) autonomic neuropathy, (6) ischemic/infiltrative/inflammatory axonopathies, and (7) focal compressive/entrapment neuropathies. An organized evaluation and management around this phenotype-first structure, combined with a structured stepwise escalation algorithm (from bedside pattern recognition to targeted laboratory testing, electrodiagnostics, selective imaging, small-fiber assessment, and immune work-up when indicated), bridges fragmented evidence into a clinic-ready decision-support framework that improves diagnostic precision, rational test utilization, and therapeutic alignment. Beyond optimizing pharmacologic care, neuromodulation may expand options in carefully selected patients. For painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), high‑frequency (10 kHz) spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been evaluated in randomized comparative studies against optimized medical management and has been associated with sustained pain reduction and functional improvement through 24 months in follow‑up reports, supporting consideration in medication‑refractory cases where access and patient factors permit. Ultrasound ‑guided pulsed radiofrequency (PRF)-a nondestructive, field‑based neuromodulation that limits tip temperature to <42 °C-has been studied in small randomized trials and observational cohorts for focal entrapment‑type neuropathic pain after positive diagnostic blocks; reported benefits are generally short‑ to mid‑term with heterogeneous protocols, so certainty varies by indication. For hereditary transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy (ATTRv), disease‑modifying approaches-including nucleic acid-based therapies-are increasingly integrated into contemporary care. Overall, these developments support earlier pattern recognition, more precise phenotyping, and rational escalation while using standardized outcome measures to track response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.