ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy Plus Systemic Chemotherapy, Lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 Inhibitors Versus Systemic Chemotherapy Plus PD-(L)1 Inhibitors in Advanced Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionThe prognosis for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains poor. This retrospective study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined therapy in advanced ICC.MethodsBetween April 2021 and July 2024, patients with advanced ICC treated with either HAIC of oxaliplatin plus systemic chemotherapy of gemcitabine, lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors (HSLP) or systemic chemotherapy plus PD-(L)1 inhibitors (SP) were consecutively enrolled. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias. Primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety.ResultsA total of 110 patients were recruited in this study with 53 in HSLP group and 57 in SP group. Prior to PSM, ORR was significantly higher (47.2% vs. 24.6%; P = 0.023) and both median OS and PFS were prolonged in HSLP group compared to SP group (OS: 15.2 vs. 12.3 months, P = 0.002; PFS: 11.3 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.004). After 1:1 PSM, outcomes remained superior in the HSLP group, with a significantly higher ORR (43.2% vs. 18.9%; P=0.032) and longer median OS (15.4 vs. 11.8 months; P=0.018) and PFS (11.9 vs. 6.9 months; P=0.019). Multivariate analysis identified the treatment regimen as an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS. All events were manageable with supportive care, and no additional toxicities were observed in the HSLP group.ConclusionHAIC plus systemic chemotherapy, lenvatinib and PD-(L)1 inhibitors represents a promising therapeutic regimen for advanced ICC patients, with tolerable toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.