Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42053731›Full record

ArticleCardiovascular engineering and technology2026

Optimizing Non-invasive Fractional Flow Reserve Estimation with Machine Learning-Enhanced 1D Hemodynamic Modeling.

Cyrus Tanade, Japneet Kaur Mavi, Guinevere Ferreira, Sam Schwaller, Amanda Randles

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiovascular engineering and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Cyrus TanadeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 534 Research Dr., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Japneet Kaur MaviDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 534 Research Dr., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Guinevere FerreiraDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 534 Research Dr., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Sam SchwallerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 534 Research Dr., Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
Amanda RandlesDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Duke University, 534 Research Dr., Durham, NC, 27705, USA. amanda.randles@duke.edu.

Funding

Dynamic models of the cardiovascular system capturing years, rather than heartbeatsDP1AG082343 · NIA · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Amanda E Randles · 2022 to 2026
$5.6M
National Science Foundation 1644868NIA NIH HHS DP1 AG082343NIA NIH HHS DP1AG082343
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-specific computational models exhibit strong concordance with invasively measured fractional flow reserve (FFR)-the clinical gold standard for diagnosing coronary ischemia. However, current modeling techniques frequently rely on computationally intensive assumptions such as pulsatile flow dynamics and often fail to optimally leverage patient-specific clinical data that is routinely available, limiting their practical clinical adoption. In this study, we propose a hybrid coronary angiography-based approach that reduces computational complexity through simplified steady-state flow assumptions, while simultaneously better leveraging available clinical information. Specifically, we integrate physics-based modeling with a machine learning (ML) feedback loop designed to refine and improve FFR predictions. We evaluated this hybrid framework using a retrospective two-center cohort comprising 132 patients with 132 coronary lesions. Our results demonstrate that steady-state models effectively capture essential hemodynamic patterns, closely matching pulsatile model predictions. The ML refinement step enhances diagnostic accuracy, yielding a sensitivity of 83.3%, specificity of 100.0%, positive predictive value of 100.0%, negative predictive value of 88.2%, and overall precision of 92.6%. By effectively combining efficient computational modeling with targeted ML-driven refinements, our approach represents a robust, clinically viable solution for accurate patient-specific FFR estimation.

Indexed as

Cardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHemodynamicsMachine LearningModels, CardiovascularPatient-Specific ModelingAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Learning ModelsPredictive Value of TestsComputational fluid dynamicsCoronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID42053731
PMCPMC13340754

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.