ArticleIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Personalised viscoelastometry-guided systemic thrombolysis for high- and intermediate-high-risk acute pulmonary embolism in the ICU: a single-centre randomised controlled interventional feasibility trial.
Article in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSystemic thrombolysis is recommended for high-risk pulmonary embolism, but is associated with a substantial bleeding risk due to thrombolysis-induced coagulopathy. However, recent advances in precision and personalised care offer the potential to reduce mortality as well as the incidence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension and post-pulmonary embolism impairment, thereby improving long-term outcomes. Our primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a viscoelastic testing-guided, low-dose, prolonged systemic thrombolysis protocol in acute pulmonary embolism. Exploratory secondary objectives included assessment of the safety and efficacy of the protocol using an individualised approach tailored to each patient's coagulation profile.
methodsThis single-centre, prospective, randomised interventional feasibility trial was conducted at Semmelweis University (Budapest, Hungary). Adult pulmonary embolism patients were randomly assigned to a control group (CG) receiving the ESC-recommended 100 mg/2 h dose of rtPA or a viscoelastometry-guided group (VGG), in which the rtPA dose and duration were adjusted based on viscoelastic tests. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed every two hours to monitor right ventricular (RV) function and determine cessation of systemic thrombolysis in VGG. The primary outcome was feasibility; the secondary outcome was safety and efficacy.
resultsAmong 33 enrolled patients, 19 were included in the analysis (CG: 7; VGG: 12). Patients in the VGG received significantly lower doses of rtPA (median 32.00 mg [IQR 20.95-42.75 mg]) despite longer infusion duration (median 8.5 h [IQR 6.6-10.0]) and showed no coagulopathy. RV dysfunction persisted in two CG patients, whereas in the VGG it resolved in all patients. Major bleeding occurred in two patients in the CG and in one patient in the VGG.
conclusionsViscoelastometry-guided, individualised, low-dose systemic thrombolysis is feasible and supports a personalised approach to thrombolysis in the management of pulmonary embolism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.