ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
Suitability and Acceptability of Decentralised Care for People Living with HIV.
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
HIV management is evolving, with improved long-term survival and patient health. However, the model of care for people living with HIV (PLWHIV) in Ireland has remained unchanged, with care focused in tertiary sites in urban centres. We explored the acceptability of decentralised HIV care at local hospitals, community healthcare settings, or with primary care providers (PCP), and the acceptability of receiving antiretroviral therapy (ART) locally. HIV attendees at two tertiary referral centres were invited to complete a questionnaire recording demographics, transit time to clinic, engagement with PCP, satisfaction with current model of care and acceptability of alternative models on a Likert scale and provide written qualitative feedback. The relationship between acceptance of new models of care and sociodemographic factors were investigated. N = 511 (71% male) PLWHIV at two tertiary HIV centres participated. The median time spent traveling to and from clinic was 1 h 50 min. While the current model of care was convenient to the majority, decentralised care models were also acceptable to most participants. Longer travel time was associated with increased acceptance of care locally (β=-0.015, p < 0.001), while male sex was associated with acceptance of community-based care (β=-1.11, p = 0.007). Care in the community and receipt of ART locally was more acceptable to younger patients. Concerns regarding stigma and lack of local expertise were cited as barriers to changing the current care model. We identify a cohort of PLWHIV for whom an alternative model of care is preferable, and supports the development of a hybrid HIV care model in Ireland.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42053905What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.