Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054559›Full record

ArticleJMIR biomedical engineering2026

Age-Related Differences in Joint Kinematics and Spatiotemporal Parameters During Ramp Walking and Level Walking: Cross-Sectional Study.

Daiki Shimotori, Soshi Fujisawa, Masahiro Nishimura, Tatsuya Yoshimi, Kenji Kato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daiki Shimotori *Laboratory of Practical Technology in Community, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Obu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1005-6492
Soshi Fujisawa *Laboratory of Clinical Evaluation with Robotics, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-cho, Obu, 474-8511, Japan, 81 562 46 2311 ext 6112, 81 562 48 2373.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-2620-4702
Masahiro NishimuraLaboratory of Clinical Evaluation with Robotics, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-cho, Obu, 474-8511, Japan, 81 562 46 2311 ext 6112, 81 562 48 2373.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-2278-0850
Tatsuya YoshimiLaboratory of Clinical Evaluation with Robotics, Assistive Robot Center, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, 7-430 Morioka-cho, Obu, 474-8511, Japan, 81 562 46 2311 ext 6112, 81 562 48 2373.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4604-7352
Kenji KatoDepartment of Mechatronics Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, Meijo University, 1-501 Shiogamaguchi, Tempaku-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 468-8502, Japan, 81-52-832-2566.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9417-6685

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gait function is essential for mobility and independence in older adults. Although age-related gait decline on level walking has been studied extensively, there is less information on how aging affects gait during ramp walking, despite its relevance in daily life. Different biomechanical strategies are used during ramp ascent and descent; however, detailed joint kinematics remain unclear, particularly under real-world conditions. Objective: This study aims to investigate age-related differences in lower-limb joint angles and spatiotemporal parameters between level and ramp walking. Methods: Gait was assessed in 20 young (mean 31.3, SD 8.9 y) and 20 older (mean 64.2, SD 0.8 y) healthy adults using a markerless motion-capture system (Theia3D) in a living laboratory setting. Participants completed gait trials during level walking and on a 7° ramp (ascent and descent). Between-group comparisons of spatiotemporal parameters were performed using independent 2-tailed t tests, while joint angle data were analyzed using a linear mixed model with walking velocity as a covariate. Estimated marginal means were compared across age groups within each walking condition, and all P values were adjusted using the false discovery rate method. Effect sizes were calculated using Cohen d to examine whether between-group differences were more pronounced during ramp walking compared to level walking. Results: Ramp walking revealed multijoint kinematic alterations, while level walking showed limited differences (hip flexion and knee extension angles only). During ramp ascent, significant increases in knee flexion angle and reductions in ankle plantarflexion angle were observed. During ramp descent, multijoint changes were evident, including increased hip flexion and reduced knee extension and ankle plantarflexion angles. Effect sizes were particularly large during ramp walking (eg, knee flexion during ascent: |d|=2.37; knee extension during descent: |d|=1.87), while level walking showed large effect sizes for several parameters (eg, knee MaxExtStance: |d|=1.18; hip MaxFlexStance: |d|=1.17) despite reaching statistical significance for only a few parameters. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional sample, age-group differences in joint kinematics were more pronounced during ramp walking than during level walking, even after adjusting for walking velocity. This suggests that ramp walking may be a more sensitive task for detecting age-related adaptations compared to level walking. Markerless motion capture enables practical assessment in real-world settings. However, longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether these patterns predict functional decline.

Indexed as

aginggait analysisliving laboratorymarkerless motion captureramp walking

Identifiers

PMID42054559
PMCPMC13128050

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.