Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42054562›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2026

Adaptation and Acceptability of a Low-Intensity Cognitive Behavioral Therapy App to Support Low Mood and Worry Management in Female Forces Veterans: Mixed Methods Study.

Paul Farrand, Andy Bacon, Melika Janbakhsh, Natalie Flay, Elizabeth Turnbull, Jonathan Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paul FarrandClinical Education, Development and Research (CEDAR), Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom, 44 7533192764.ORCID 0000-0001-7898-5362
Andy BaconWestminster Centre for Research in Veterans, University of Chester, Cheshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0009-0001-0815-6101
Melika JanbakhshClinical Education, Development and Research (CEDAR), Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom, 44 7533192764.ORCID 0000-0001-8860-6557
Natalie FlayClinical Education, Development and Research (CEDAR), Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom, 44 7533192764.ORCID 0009-0008-4902-3840
Elizabeth TurnbullClinical Education, Development and Research (CEDAR), Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Perry Road, Exeter, EX4 4QG, United Kingdom, 44 7533192764.ORCID 0009-0005-4087-2019
Jonathan BakerIona Mind Inc, Wilmington, DE, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-9923-5042

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mental health help-seeking barriers experienced by female forces veterans result in them being underserved and underrepresented. Efforts are therefore required to adapt interventions for female veterans to enhance acceptability and maximize engagement. Given a smaller number and wider geographical distribution of female veterans, targeting adaptation efforts at a digital mobile phone app based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has potential for greatest impact to improve access to a scalable evidence-based psychological therapy. Objective: This study aimed to examine the adaptation of a low-intensity CBT app to support low mood and worry management in female forces veterans and examine acceptability and usability. Methods: Using a mixed methods methodology, this study comprises a focus group of female forces veterans to inform adaptation with extracted themes used as the basis of an adaptation framework. Following adaptation, a wider sample of female veterans was recruited to use the app and complete the mHealth App Usability Questionnaire to determine acceptability, usability, and usefulness. Results: Two main areas were identified as requiring adaptation to maximize acceptability and usability. While using imagery and quotes to reflect the armed forces was initially found helpful to initiate engagement, it was considered that continued reference to the armed forces should be dropped when progressing through the app. Most app features were found acceptable; however, adaptations were requested to the content and structure of signposting information, navigation, and the way progress was monitored. No adaptations were required, however, regarding the CBT techniques used, with specific app features motivating engagement. Following the adaptation, there were good levels of acceptability, usability, and usefulness. Conclusions: Involving female forces veterans as part of an intervention adaptation process has promise to improve acceptability and engagement with a digital CBT mobile phone intervention. Ensuring that the intervention represented the transition from serving to female forces veteran is of particular significance in enhancing acceptability.

Indexed as

AnxietyCognitive Behavioral TherapyMobile ApplicationsPatient Acceptance of Health CareVeteransAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMiddle Agedacceptabilityadaptationarmed forcesEcological Validity Frameworkfemalelow-intensity CBTmixed methodsveterans

Identifiers

PMID42054562
PMCPMC13128060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.